Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  49 / 52 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 49 / 52 Next Page
Page Background

KONE 2016 | SUSTAINABILITY REPORT

INDEPENDENT ASSURANCE REPORT

4 9

INDEPENDENT ASSURANCE STATEMENT –KONE’S GHG EMISSIONS 2016

To the Management and

Stakeholders of KONE Oyj

Scope and Objectives

The Management of KONE Oyj

commissioned us to perform a limited third

party assurance engagement regarding

greenhouse gas emissions inventory data

(“GHG emissions”) including Scope 1,

2 and 3 emissions disclosed in KONE’s

Sustainability Report (“Report”) for the

period of 1st January to 31st December

2016. The assurance engagement was

conducted in accordance with the AA1000

Assurance Standard (2008).

Responsibilities

KONE is responsible for the collection, calcu-

lation and presentation of GHG emissions

inventory data according to the Green-

house Gas Protocol. The Management of

KONE has approved the information on

GHG emissions disclosed in the Report. Our

responsibility as assurance providers is to

express an independent conclusion on the

GHG emissions disclosures subject to the

limited assurance engagement. The report-

ing criteria used for our assessment include

the following guidelines and standards:

• Greenhouse Gas Protocol. A Corporate

Accounting and Reporting Standard

• Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate

Value Chain (Scope 3) Accounting and

Reporting, and

• Global Reporting Initiative’s

Sustainability Reporting Guidelines

(4.0).

Assurance Provider’s Independence

and Competence

We have conducted our assessment as

independent and impartial from the reporting

organisation. We were not committed to

any assignments for KONE that would

conflict with our independence, nor were

we involved in the preparation of the GHG

emissions inventory data. Our team consists

of competent and experienced sustainability

reporting experts, who have the necessary

skills to perform an assurance process.

Basis of Our Opinion

Assurance providers are obliged to plan and

perform the assurance process so as to ensure

that they collect adequate evidence for the

necessary conclusions to be drawn. The

procedures selected depend on the assurance

provider’s judgement, including their

assessment of the risk of material misstatement

adhering to the reporting criteria.

Our opinion is based on the following

procedures performed:

Our opinion is based on the following

procedures performed:

• Interviews with KONE specialists respon-

sible for GHG data collection and report-

ing at Group level and in selected sites.

• Review of Group-level systems and

procedures to generate, collect and report

quantitative data on GHG emissions.

• Assessment of Group-level calculations and

data consolidation procedures and internal

controls to ensure the accuracy of data.

• Testing the accuracy and completeness of

the information from original documents

and systems on a sample basis.

Conclusion

Based on the work described in this

report, nothing has come to our attention

that causes us to believe that the GHG

emissions inventory

data disclosed in KONE Sustainability

Report 2016 is not reliable, in all material

respects, based on the reporting criteria.

Helsinki, Finland, 7th April 2017

Mitopro Oy

Mikael Niskala

Independent Sustainability Expert

Tomi Pajunen

Independent Sustainability Expert

customers. Inbound logistics of materials to

KONE’s manufacturing sites is excluded from

the reporting scope because of its minor

impact (KONE prefers material suppliers

located close to our manufacturing units,

and a large part of the modules are delivered

directly from suppliers to KONE distribution

centers). The quality and coverage of data

provided by our logistics suppliers has over

the years continuously improved.

KONE has used an environmental

performance software system since 2011.

The environmental data has been

collected from branch offices using a

customized data collection spreadsheet

consolidated on the country level. The

country-level data has been entered into

the environmental performance system.

The data has further been consolidated

globally in a combined effort with KONE’s

global carbon footprint assessment.

The environmental performance has

been reported in accordance with ISO

14064 and the Greenhouse Gas Protocol

Corporate Standard. The Scope 2

emissions for the reporting year 2016 and

base year 2015 are calculated according

to the dual reporting principles of the

GHG Protocol Scope 2 Guidance (market-

and location-based method. RES-GO

guarantees of origin subject to EECS

(European Energy Certificate System)

have been acquired for the purchased

green electricity. KONE’s greenhouse gas

emissions for scope 1 and scope 2 (direct

and indirect energy consumption) and

scope 3 (logistics and business air travel)

have been assured by Mitopro Oy. The

emission factors are based on the data

sources of the International Energy Agency,

World Resources Institute GHG Emission

Factors Compilation, Statistics Finland Fuel

Classification, and DEFRA (UK Department

for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs).

We welcome any feedback on this report

or our overall sustainability performance -

please contact corporate communications at

contact@kone.com.